|
CONSTRUCTING LIFE TABLES FOR Homo sapiens
In this laboratory, you will construct a couple of life tables for humans (Homo sapiens, mammals in the order Primates and family Hominidae) from data that you will gather in a local cemetery. From the field data, we will construct age pyramids, life tables and from these data then calculate survivorship curves. Evolutionary theory allows us to make several predictions about survivorship curves. Socioeconomic conditions might also suggest predictions about survivorship curves. The purposes of this lab are to give you some practice in working with life-table data, and also to test some preliminary predictions about survivorship curves.
Human Burial Grounds
Humans characteristically bury their dead in common burial grounds known as graveyards or cemeteries. Each deceased person has a grave-site marker that gives their name, date of birth, and date of death. One of the ways that life tables can be constructed is from age-structured schedules of death. There are other ways to construct life tables, but as you might expect, most of the methods of life-table construction are related to each other by some fairly simple algebra. The fact that such information can be extracted from cemeteries gives us a powerful tool for asking questions about survivorship curves. Such curves can be easily plotted from the columns in our life tables. Because we are humans ourselves, there are many traits that we all have and that we tend to take for granted. For example, over what time period should we measure deaths in the cemetery populations? Of course, the most convenient is a year. This is also likely to be the most convenient unit of time for study of deer or elephants. Depending on our sample sizes, however, it might be better to use 2- or 5-year intervals so that there are plenty of individuals represented in each category. This issue will have to be decided once the data are in hand. Additional phenomena that might influence our data for human life tables are social characteristics. Humans die from other causes than starvation, malnutrition, and old age. Wars result in considerable human mortality, but usually the males suffer greater war-related mortality than females. Human medical care has exhibited a social evolution that has resulted in greater longevity for individuals of both sexes, with the greatest advances coming fairly recently. Finally, it is well known that the human population of the United States has grown dramatically in the last two or three hundred years. But the population of Austin,Texas from which our cemetery samples were taken, has shown more gradual increases over the last one hundred years and may even have gone through some periods of decrease.
Questions About Survivorship Curves There are a variety of questions that we might examine with life table data. The most obvious question that can be asked is whether the survival curves of males and females are the same or different. Evolutionary theory allows us to predict which sex should have a survival advantage. Reproduction in humans is thought to be much more costly for females because they have to carry their babies through pregnancy and then go through a period of lactation when they produce energetically expensive milk. So females of child-bearing age (roughly from 15-20 to 45-50) should suffer higher mortality (and thus lower survival) than males of similar age. Social or political influences may also cause sexual differences in survival curves. For example, some cemeteries date back to the Civil War, and World Wars I and II. During a war, mortality should be higher and thus survival curves lower, especially for men due to the historical bias against women for combat assignments. Another question that we might ask about life-table from local cemeteries is whether different historical periods have had different survival curves. For example, over the past hundred years there has been a dramatic increase in the average life expectancy of an adult in western societies because of improved health attention, health care, and medical services. We should expect to see an increase in survival curves over historical time. The "health care" hypothesis predicts that cemeteries with older mean ages should have lower survival curves. So, in all, we have three hypotheses that we should be able to discriminate by their different predictions. And you should be able to think of more hypotheses.
Methods
We will take you to a cemetery where we will gather data on the birth of individuals for two time periods, 1840-1849 and 1850-1899. Work in groups of about two students. One of you can record the data, and the other can work with a calculator to find out how old each individual was when they died. The lab groups should divide up the area of the cemetery so that all areas are sampled, but none are sampled more than once. Be sure to keep a running tally of: sex of the individual, age at death, and year of birth. To determine sex, examine the individual's name. Some names are obviously male or female. For names that could be either (e.g., Leslie), keep an "unknown sex" category. Work as quickly as you can, but also be careful to show respect for where you are. Do not walk across graves! Stick to the pathways.
Data Analysis Back in the lab we will use this information to construct an age pyramid for 1876, allowing us to characterize the population. Total up the number of deaths at each age class for everyone in your lab for the two different time periods. Remember to keep the sexes separate. Then total the number of individuals in your "male" and "female" samples. The number of individuals in each age class may be plotted as a histogram, forming a "pyramid." Age is placed on the vertical axis and the number, or the proportion, of individuals in each age class is plotted that a symmetrical, pyramidal graph results. Age pyramids such as these are useful for comparing populations from different sites, or the same population at different times of the year or from year to year. Construct an age pyramid for the year 1876. Do this by:
Table 1. Number of males and females in each age class for 1876.
In a life table (Table 2), various statistics are compiled for each age class, or cohort (designated as x). Data are commonly collected as numbers of individuals in each age class. Lx is the number of individuals in age class x. It is assumed that Lx is the number alive at the middle of age class x (for example, in the above table, 33 individuals are assumed to be 5 years old, even though the true ages of the 33 might range between 0 and 10 years old). We designate lx as the number of individuals alive at the beginning of age class x. Thus, Lx may be defined as Lx = ( lx + lx+1)/2 and, lx = 2Lx - lx+1 For example, in Table 2, L0 = 33, L1 = 16, L2 = 9, L3 = 4, L4 = 1, L5 = 0. Since L5 = 0, we can set l5 = 0. Then by applying the above equation, l5 = 0 The number of individuals in the population that die during interval x is: dx = lx - lx+1 Note that the sum of the dx values must equal l0; in our example 46. The age-specific mortality rate (qx) is the proportion of individuals at the start of age interval x who die during that age interval: qx = dx / lx also expressed as the probability of an individual dying during the interval. The age-specific survival rate (sx) for age interval x is the proportion of individuals alive at the start of the interval who do not die during the interval period. In other words, sx is the probability of surviving age interval x: sx = 1 - qx We can calculate age-specific life expectancy (commonly done for human populations) as follows. Let us define Tx as the number of time units left for all individuals to live from age x onward; this is obtained by summing Lx values as follows: Tx = Lx + Tx+1 and expressing Tx in time units; so T4 = L4 = 1 yr Then, the life expectancy for an individual of age x is ex = Tx/lx Life expectancy represents the average additional length of time that an individual will live, once it has reached age x. To compare different populations, the numbers dying (dx) or surviving (lx) are often expressed as number per 100 or per 1000 individuals entering the population at age 0; that is l0 is set to 100 or 1000, and all other life-table entries are expressed relative to this value. For the example in our table, we have l0 = 46 and l1 = 20. If we set l0 = 100, then we would have an l1 value of (20/46)(100) = 43.5. In other words, for every 100 individuals born into the population, 43.5 survive to age 1. Various types of graphs may be constructed from life table data, including mortality rate curves, life expectancy curves and survivorship curves. Most widely used among ecologists, the survivorship curve is prepared by plotting the of the number of survivors against age (sometimes this done on semilogarithmic paper). From this graphical presentation, three basic types of curves are recognizable, as discussed in lecture. We will construct percentage survivorship curves by age for both males and
females living during each of the two time periods, 1800-1849 and
1850-1899. Using the data sheet for the survivorship, determine the number
surviving to each age for males and females. Calculate the age class,
number that died, percent surviving. Using these data, plot the
survivorship curve for each gender (male or female) for each time period.
What can you say about
survival and life expectancies during these two time periods?
Questions 1. Take a close look at your survivorship curves. How might you explain their general form or appearance? Are factors in the ecological or social environment important to the shape of survivorship curves? 2. Are there "wiggles" in your survivorship curves? What sorts of factors, real or artifact, might cause variations in survival schedules? How would you go about testing the influence of such factors?
References Brower, J.E., Zar, C.H. and C.N. vonEnde. 1997. Field and laboratory methods for general ecology. 4th ed. WCB McGraw-Hill. pp.138-142. Caughley, G. 1977. Analysis of Vertebrate Populations. John Wiley & Sons, New York. Pages 85-106. Hutchinson, G. E. 1978. "Interesting ways of thinking about death", Chapter 2 in: An Introduction to Population Ecology. Yale University Press, New Haven. Pages 41-89. Krebs, C. J. 1989. Ecological Methodology. Harper & Row, New York. Pages 411-422. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Course Index | UT Life Sciences | UT Home
|